Make a difference

Not ready to be a member?

Make a small donation to keep us going.

Have a question?

Message us on Facebook.

Investigations   04.24.2018

Five telltale signs that industry cash funded a study

Lack of disclosure and outrageous claims are usually giveaways that a scientific study has corporate fingerprints.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart famously described obscenity in 1964 by stating, “I know it when I see it.” If only the same could be said of industry-funded studies.

It can be challenging for the average consumer to discern whether a study plastered across the news was funded by corporate interests, and whether the science is trustworthy, regardless of who paid for it. The challenge is compounded by a hollowed-out news media that often lacks the time and resources to investigate every claim and social media post that runs light on details.

Fortunately, you don’t need to spend hours wading through voluminous and highly technical scientific literature for clues. Marion Nestle, one of the nation’s foremost specialists on food industry studies, told Tarbell via email that it’s best to start with a simple question: Does the conclusion make sense?

“If it does, it’s probably right,” wrote Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health, emerita, at New York University. “If the conclusion is hyped as a breakthrough, or as everything you thought you knew about nutrition is wrong, skepticism is greatly in order.”

Produced by Joey Rettino

In 2011, a nutrition study featured this stunning conclusion: Kids who eat candy weigh less than their counterparts. The sponsor, not surprisingly, was the National Confections Association, which counts Hershey’s and other major candy manufacturers as members. But even without knowing who paid for the research, the study wouldn’t pass Nestle’s gut check.

Look for these five telltale signs to spot industry research and decide whether you can trust it:

  1. No Disclosure: When critical details are missing or buried, such as who sponsored the research, be on guard. This is a sure sign that a report was funded by a company or industry that’s trying to hide or minimize its role.
  2. Effusive Praise: Gushing praise by companies and industry trade organizations or their supporters, which can include front groups, could indicate research was designed to serve a corporate agenda.
  3. Outrageous Claims: Be skeptical about any conclusions that seem to defy logic—or appear intended mostly to boost the image and market share of a particular product or company.
  4. External variables: Any research should always be viewed in a wider context. Perhaps there’s a motivating factor, such as an upcoming referendum that could tax or ban a product, a company recall, or impending regulation in Washington.
  5. Lack of Peer Review: The peer-review process involves evaluation of scholarly work by specialists in the same field. The most reputable scientific journals only accept peer-reviewed articles for publication. But as highlighted by this cautionary Center for Public Integrity article, peer review doesn’t always guarantee scientific rigor.

Genna Reed, lead science and policy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, emphasizes that no study is the final word on any subject. “You should recognize that the findings of one study do not necessarily mean that that’s the general consensus of the scientific community.”

“Part of the scientific process is the accumulation of science and understanding” that creates a wide body of research on a topic, she explained.

Spot some biased corporate research?

Message us on Facebook.

For a broader perspective, search for news about a report’s sponsor, examine the conflict-of-interest policy of the journal that published it and read about other studies  on the same topic.

If research conducted by independent parties raises concerns about a product cast in a more favorable light by a study of questionable origin, it’s a safe guess that the latter was industry sponsored.

Solutions Database

Big industries skewing science: What you can do

  1. Help Tarbell spot industry-funded studies as we grow a database of phony and biased research backed by corporate money. Email hello@tarbell.org with “#IndustryFunded” in the subject line, or post studies on Facebook and Twitter with #IndustryFunded.
  2. Learn to spot an industry-funded study. It’s not hard. You just need to ask some key questions, like, “Are the results too good to be true?” Find out more here.
  3. The Union of Concerned Scientists offers the Disinformation Playbook, a site that tracks the myriad ways industry uses skewed studies to win policy battles and get potentially unsafe products to market. You can find out more about how to personally address the problem here.
  4. If you are scientist, check out PubPeer, the site that encourages volunteer experts to review newly published studies for errors, omissions and conflicts of interest. Think of it as a crowd-sourced way to keep other scientists honest. Find out more about it here.
  5. Another tool for scientists: The Center for Open Science. The project aims to put science on a free, open source platform to make scientific findings easily reproducible, verifiable and findable. Learn more about them here.
  6. The Reproducibility Initiative is another effort to guarantee study findings through independent testing of key results. Find out more here.
  7. If you’re wondering whether a medicine you take or a medical device in your body has caused harm to other individuals, the law firm of Wilson & Peterson operates Drugwatch.com. Ambulance chasing aside, it is a handy quick reference. Find out more here.

Tarbell is nonpartisan. We do not endorse you taking these actions. But sharing them with you is part of our commitment to helping you find solutions. Email questions to questions@tarbell.org. And learn more about these solutions here